|
|
 |

|
 |
 |
 |
January 2012 |
 |
| Go East – and accumulate gold |
Amid all the gloom and doom in global markets and downgrade after downgrade of Western countries and banks that we saw in 2011, it has been somewhat overlooked that a number of emerging market economies and banks actually received upgrades during this time
As an example, Indonesia regained investment grade status last month by Fitch ratings, ending a 14 years stretch of being rated as “junk”. And major Chinese banks (which everyone seems to love to hate or to run from fear), actually were upgraded by Standard & Poor’s with the same stroke of a pen that saw 6 U.S. financial institutions downgraded:
The World Bank also recently issued a report highlighting the potential of most Asian nations to withstand a worsening of the Europe crisis, given their strong fiscal positions:
So when looking at recent global market movements, we would suggest that investors maintain a cool head, identify calmly where market sell-offs may be justified and where not, with the view to possibly enter oversold but fundamentally attractive areas/country exposures, such as in the emerging market as well as in the commodities space.
Depending on the severity of the Eurozone crisis (as well as the US debt crisis that is nowhere near fixed either), and the readiness of the Fed and ECB to engage in QE (money printing) to inflate the debt away, there surely are risks for emerging markets too. But there is always risk when investing, in anything, including cash that may actually get hardest hit soon as money printing/provision of limitless central bank liquidity appears to be the only answer to out-of-control debt – short of major countries’ defaults and financial chaos that policymakers seek to avoid.
More specifically with regards to commodities/ precious metals, we would like to note that a number of extraordinary factors combined in the second half of last year that drove prices down considerably, such as margin hikes, the MF Global scare, and in the case of gold also forced selling or gold leasing by cash-starved Eurozone countries and banks. But margin hikes can’t continue indefinitely, and emergency gold can only be sold once. As these factors wear off, rising inflation combined with continued strong commodities/precious metals demand particularly from Asian consumers and investors may soon overpower the recent down-trend.
|
| Investment Committee, Tyche Group Limited |
| |
| |
 |
|
|
| Global inflation puts pressure on emerging markets |
This year’s headline news is on global markets and their focus on how to fight inflation. Not only is inflation become an issue in emerging markets but also to some developed countries.
Recently, the People’s bank of China raised interest rates during the Lunar New Year holiday, the third times in four months, reflecting the Mainland’s determination to fight inflation. Although China's consumer price index increased in January up to 4.9% from last months 4.6%, it is lower than the market expectation of more than 5%, but whilst the conditions of drought continue in the North of the country, it is expected that inflationary pressures will remain.
Emerging markets in Asian countries have been suffering from the gradual emergence of inflation pressure since last year, mainly due to strong local economic recovery after the financial crisis coupled with global hot money inflow. This year, Thailand and South Korea's Central Bank took the lead in raising interest rates, by 0.25% respectively. In the BRIC countries, India's Central Bank base rate increased from 6.25% to 6.50%, their rates were raised 6 times in the last year. India’s Central Bank's inflation forecast has increased from the previous 5.5% to 7%. Brazil's central bank interest rate has increased by 0.5 % with interest rates rising to 11.25% as they recorded an inflation rate of 5.91% last year, the highest in the past six years.
In order to suppress the inflation problem, most central banks are using more restrictive monetary policy, in addition to increasing interest rates, some countries such as Brazil, Chile and Taiwan have launched capital control measures to prevent hot money inflows, and quell the potential for asset bubbles to surface.
| Country |
Index |
| China |
Jan CPI |
4.9% |
| United Kingdom |
Jan CPI |
4.0% |
| Euro Zone |
Jan CPI |
2.7% |
| US |
Jan CPI |
0.4% |
Recently, the ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet’s comment drew investor’s attention. After an ECB meeting , Trichet claimed the Euro zone is facing a short term inflationary threat. Countries have to be very careful when deal with the threat of commodity prices pushing up inflation and to ensure there are no second-round effects on prices. In fact, the headline inflation in the euro zone jumped to 2.2% in December, and has jumped up to 2.7% recently, that is above the ECB's target. The CPI in United Kingdom in January jumped from 3.7% to 4%, much higher than the target level of the Bank of England’s 2%.
As for the United States, January consumer price index rose by 0.4% and the FED claimed that the inflation is too low and may stay below the Fed's target of 2% through to the end of 2013. However, from the current economic recovery in Europe and America, there should be no room for increasing the interest rates in the short run. In the context of global inflation, tangible assets are highly sought after; investors may wish to pay attention to agricultural products and precious metal investments. In addition, due to the worry of having negative interest rates, and concerns of continuing decline in the purchasing power of money, funds will flow into the stock market seeking for higher returns, stock market will be a good choice at the moment, and especially emerging markets will have a long-term investment return.
|
MPF Division,TYCHE Group |
| |
| How members should do in the MPF Price Cut War |
Last November HSBC announced the launch of a new MPF scheme by the end of 1st quarter, with the charges ranging from 0.79% to 0.99%. Recently, HSBC also announced that effective from March the management fees of the selected constituent funds including all existing MPF schemes of Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund, MPF Conservative Fund, and Global Bond Fund will be revised. The new management fees will be reduced from the original of 1.25% to 1.5% to 0.79% to 0.99 respectively.
At the beginning of the year, AXA announced the renaming of its two existing mandatory provident fund schemes and actively reduced the management fees to attract new customers. While the other trustees such as Bank of Communication, Bank Consortium Trust Company Ltd and Fidelity are preparing to fight back by studying if there is any room for a fee reduction.
Given that the "Member Choice" is deferred, the price war between the trustees should be slowing down, while HSBC is taking the lead in actively reducing management fees, a price war is like an arrow in the bow. To sum up, many of the trustees are only providing fee reduction on certain funds or new schemes or only to new clients and individual provident funds, instead of to the whole scheme as it was in the past.
| Date |
Custodian |
Details |
| Feb 2011 |
HSBC/
Hang Seng |
Effective on March, management fees of all existing schemes including Hang Seng Index Tracking Fund, MPF Conservative Fund, and Global Bond Fund will be reduced to 0.79%-0.99%.I |
| Jan 2011 |
AXA |
Double Easy renamed to “Smart Plan” and Elite renamed to “Simple Plan” while all new clients can enjoy the management fee of as low as 0.99 % |
| Nov 2010 |
HSBC/
Hang Seng |
New scheme will be launched on the 1st quarter of 2011 with management fees of 0.79%-0.99% and contains passive funds in the scheme. |
| Oct 2010 |
Principal |
Hang Seng index fund will be launched in the MPF 600 series and also reduce the management fees of the 500, 600 and 800 series from current 1.25%-1.5% to 1%. |
| Jul 2010 |
BOCI-
Prudential |
The new scheme “My choice” was launched with average management fee of 0.99%. |
However, the cuts have been criticized by the public. For example at HSBC and BOCI-Prudential, their new plan charges are way less than the existing one, and as for AXA, the special fee offer is limited to new customers only and existing customers are not receiving this benefit.
The reason is that Trustees hope to attract new customers through price reductions; on the other hand, full price reduction is too costly. Therefore it only applies to certain schemes or certain funds. According to data from the MPFA, this shows that by the end of 2010, the net asset value of the MPF is HKD 365.4 billion, and using the "Fund expense ratio" (FER) 1.84% as indicator, the estimate charges captured by Trustees is about HKD 6.7 billion.
HSBC and Hang Seng Bank are the most significant players by size in the MPF market as their combined market share is about 32%, if they fully lowered fees from the current 1.85% to 0.99%, they will lose nearly HKD 1 billion in fee income, far higher than the present proposed fee reduction of about HKD 200 million.
Whilst most of the members would benefit from the fee reduction, in choosing a mandatory provident fund scheme, it is important not only to focus on the charges, but also to look at the fund performance. For example, a lot of active funds performed much better than HSBC’s Hang Seng index fund in the Hong Kong equity market. Although these other funds charge a higher fee than Hang Seng’s passive fund they deliver a better return. Therefore, members should compare the schemes comprehensively to fight for better returns.
| Hong Kong Equities |
Features |
Return
In 2010 |
FER |
Invesco Hong Kong
and China Equity |
Cheapest |
12.70% |
1.24% |
AXA RCM
Hong Kong Equity |
Most expensive |
15.04% |
2.43% |
HSBC Hang Seng
Index Tracking |
Typical Hang Seng
Index Fund |
6.42% |
1.65% |
Sun Life First state
Hong Kong Equity |
Best performed
active fund |
24.65% |
1.70% |
| Manulife Hong Kong Equity |
Worst performed
active Fund |
6.21% |
2.42% |
| *Source:Morningstar Hong Kong 2010 |
|
| |
 |
| |
Do you have any comments on this issue? Or topics you would like to see covered in future issues? Would you like us to e-mail Market Truth to you every month? Please direct all enquiries to: contact@tyche-group.com |
| |
 |
This newsletter is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for professional financial advice. Tyche Group Limited shall not be liable for any pecuniary loss arising from the use of any information provided herein. |
| |
 |
| |
22 February 2012 (Wednesday), 6:30pm to 8:00pm
Registration : 6:15pm
Podium Floor, Executive Club, Central Plaza,
18 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong
DON'T LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE
We have been asked a lot recently how to be positioned for the Eurozone debt crisis, including how one may benefit from it, as an investor.
One of the questions has been whether or not one should buy Credit Default Swaps (CDS – a risk insurance against a countries default) on countries like Italy and France, betting on their rising default risk. What we would like to point out in this regard is two-fold:
Firstly, when buying such CDS, it should be noted that they would only be triggered if the country in question actually defaulted. For this reason one needs to ask how likely it would be for Italy and France to default, given their considerable influence over the ECB which may simply expand money-printing (contrary to official assurances of respecting the ECB’s original mandate) to a level where their debt would be bailed-out or inflated away? So (just like in the case of the United States which really is in as dire a financial position as the aforementioned countries), an outright default may happen, but it also may not!
And perhaps more importantly, from whom would investors usually buy such CDS? In France, BNP Paribas has sold 1.5bn euros of them on France’s debt, in Italy UniCredit insures more than 500 million of its governments bonds, and interestingly, in Austria, Oesterreichische Volksbanken AG has guaranteed 839 million euros of its national debt (although the latter bank has even yet to pay interest on 1 billion euros of state aid it received in 2009).
The problem here is that, if Italy really declared bankruptcy, then chances are that UniCredit would vanish even before, or at latest default together with the government – in which case the CDS it issued would be worthless too, defeating the whole point of the exercise. And who would want a Euro denominated CDS anyway, if the Eurozone (and presumably thereby also its currency) was in collapse?
So, we suggest to look elsewhere for opportunities instead, and will discuss those in more detail accordingly.
Please join us at our February Seminar presented in English by Julian Galvin (Executive Director) and Martin Hennecke (Associate Director), for a review of these topics and the outlook going forwards. As always, we aim to make our Seminars as interactive as possible, with questions from the audience most welcome.
As seats are limited, so please register early to avoid disappointment. Please register in any of the following ways:
phone (852) 2525 3639; fax (852) 2525 3679; or e-mail forum@tyche-group.com |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|